Saturday, February 24, 2018

It's not Left vs Right

It’s not about Left vs Right, Socialism vs Capitalism, Democracy vs Feudalism, Gay vs Straight etc… It is about individual choice vs collective choice.

The American Experience is based on a fundamental respect for the rights of the individual. The founders recognized that government is a two edged sword. That eventually it could be corrupted to a point that individual rights and freedoms would no longer be protected. In their best efforts they spread out, and limited, the various powers of the government to create a sort of deadlock that would resist the level of corruption needed to destroy a free society.

The declaration of Independence clearly states “...all men are created equal…”. This means that the rights of all individuals are the same. This does not guarantee an absence of prejudice except under the law. Personal biases and perceptions are protected in the same way as free speech. Regardless of how popular or disfavored those biases may be. The individual has the right to carry them and express them how they see fit. So long as legal rights are not impeded by those biases, and the individual does nothing to harm or injure another.

Perhaps here is where the term “Harm” must be clarified. In the bill of rights it is stated that we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The right to life is straightforward. We have the right to protect and cherish our individual lives and the lives of those we care about. The right to liberty is based in our right to choose our own actions and that we remain free to pursue our own goals and interests. The right to the pursuit of happiness indicates that we have the right to pursue joy wherever we may find it. We are free to exercise all three of these rights so long as we do not violate any of these rights for others in the process. Harm only takes place when one of these three rights are infringed by an individual or group.

Today the right to the pursuit of happiness has been misconstrued to be “the right to happiness”. This  means that if we are unhappy and we claim that another person is the reason for our unhappiness, that government should be used to punish that person so that we can be happy. This is an impossible position because Government cannot guarantee happiness no matter how powerful or intrusive it may become.

There are many ways to pursue happiness that do not involve taking happiness away from another person. Of course all of those other methods require an unhappy individual to “let it go” or to self reflect to find different ways to look at an offensive moment. And that is not popular in our day and age.

The supposed “right to happiness” is at the root of every attack on individual freedom that we are seeing in today’s political climate. It is the fundamental basis for identity politics and it is tearing our country apart at the seams and driving us toward a government that is far too powerful for individual rights to be protected. It is corrupting our political system top to bottom.

There are those among us that wish to perpetuate the myth that government can and must protect individual happiness. They are not acting out of some altruistic ideal, they are acting based on their desire to gain personal and political power over all of us. We have seen all of this before. Communism, Socialism, and Nationalism, are all forms of Collectivism. They seek to force conformity in one way or another. And they will all use whatever means necessary to accomplish that goal.

Do any of you find it interesting that collectivism only came on the scene in response to American individualism? Is it not curious that the two forms of society are exact opposites of each other? Collectivism values unified thought, ethnicity, and values. In the collective mind set any that do not fit are removed from the group in often horrific ways because collectivism cannot tolerate diversity. On the other hand, individualism values divergent ideas, ethnic diversity, and a wide range of different values. It seeks compromise and innovation of thought and culture. It is open to the free debate of many ideas. As a result the stronger ideas rise to the surface and promote advancement of the culture as a whole.

Our media and political climate today are pushing very hard toward the collectivism that has led to so many horrific events in the worlds history. They have been striving to create a perception that the happiness of some groups has been stolen by other groups and that a massive and intrusive government based on the idea of guaranteeing happiness for individuals and recognized groups is not only possible but necessary.

Make no mistake, if we were to all wake up tomorrow and every person was as happy as they wanted to be. Those seeking power would find new ways to divide us and play us against each other. They would divide us by hair color, eye color, whether we had a lisp or not, eyes too far apart, eyes too close together. It doesn’t matter because their goal is not to make us all happy, but to manipulate us into giving them power by claiming that they can guarantee our happiness. It is just as ridiculous as the 6th grader running for class president saying that he will get the students pizza for lunch every day.

Once collectivism has taken hold it will head toward it’s ultimate goal of weeding out those that the collective feels are undesirable. But at that point it is no longer the majority that sets the course for the collective. It is a small handful of individuals that will murder and steal to achieve whatever ideal they see as best for everyone else and to secure their own power above all other concerns. They will no longer bother to guarantee happiness. Because it was just an empty lie told to help them accumulate power.

We can head this off by taking ownership of our own happiness. By looking inward instead of outward for it. By once again respecting the rights of others and acknowledging that our rights are just as dependant on their respect of our rights as their rights are dependant upon our respect for theirs.

I read a phrase once. It said, “...and by their fruits ye shall know them.” Yes, it is a scriptural reference and it proves true when looking at individuals. It is also true when looking at political philosophies. American Individualism has lifted the world to it’s greatest and most enlightened state in known history. Collectivism in all it’s forms has given us, multiple mass murders that were executed by governments that sought to weed out the undesirables and to secure their own power. It has given us the ethnic cleansing and open execution of those who do not share Islamist beliefs in the middle east, and it has given us the horrible tragedy that is Venezuela.

Let us look at ourselves for solutions instead of others. Let us see that America works because it is right, not because it is evil, and let us acknowledge that individual rights are fundamental to our success as a nation.

Creative Commons License
“It’s Not Left vs Right" by Nathan L. Lowe is licensed under a

Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.

Monday, May 22, 2017

Overview: The 3 Pillars of Public Policy

Public policy has lost it's way. Our leaders have been so tossed about by the storm of public opinion, they have lost the ability to be constant and truly forward thinking when creating and implementing public policy that will provide the greatest long term benefit for those they serve, The citizens. They have forgotten that their power is based on the trust of those who place them in office and have abandoned principles for the sake of imaginary power. This power will dissipate as they continue to lose the trust of their constituents and they will find themselves in the most unpleasant of circumstances on the day that the people choose to reclaim the power that they had entrusted their representatives with.

I believe there is time to correct this error. I believe there is an approach that can save our nation and reestablish the trust and admiration that was once afforded to our public representatives. I call this approach "The 3 Pillars of Public Policy" and I will be providing an outline of this concept here in this writing.

The 3 Pillars of Public Policy

I believe that the implementation of public policy that promotes the fulfillment of these three pillars will lift our nation from the divided and corrupt state that it is in, and return us to a greater ethical and moral standard than this nation has seen in the past 50+ years.

The 3 pillars are; Life, Liberty, and Fiscal Responsibility. This may sound kind of familiar. The Declaration of Independence used the aspects of Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness. I believe that adherence to these 3 pillars will allow our citizens the greatest opportunity to pursue and achieve happiness.

Life:
The pillar of Life encompasses the need to protect all life in any way possible and it requires that we acknowledge that human life is the most important form of life on this planet.
Why is human life the most important? Well, to me it is obvious. Human life is the most important because human life has the greatest potential of all other life combined. Our ability to reason and manipulate the environment around us is unparallelled in Earth's history.

Policies that uphold this pillar would include policies that protect the environment, and endangered species. But not at the cost of human life or livelihood.
This also includes policies that put an end to the systematic murder of millions of unborn children in this country. The potential of an unborn child is far too great a resource to waste.

Liberty:
The pillar of Liberty is focused on our freedom to act, think, and believe anything we want to. It also requires the hard thing of allowing those we disagree with to act, think, and believe anything that they want to. It means that we must be allowed to suffer the consequences of our choices, and reap the rewards as well.

We should not implement policies that shelter individuals from the consequences of their Liberty and we should not implement policies that rob individuals of the rewards of their Liberty.

Fiscal Responsibility:
This pillar cuts to the core of our defective public policy. Our representatives have too long been allowed to steal from future generations to further their short term grasps for power. They take money from the public coffers and offer it up to their campaign supporters as part of a self perpetuating cycle that continues to remove our public officials from an understanding of the true needs of the public. Or worse, the money has been used to create a state of dependence among those who are “assisted” by tax payer funds with no expectation or encouragement to break free of the dependance.

This pillar, when adhered to will create a greater desire for self reliance among our people and ultimately reduce the number of individuals and families that are dependent on tax payer programs for their livelihood.

Policies that uphold this pillar will provide assistance when needed and require the recipient to work in some capacity while receiving the assistance. I believe that so long as an individual has the capacity to reason, they have the ability to work. Examples of this would be Stephen Hawking, or Bill Gates to name just a couple of people. Both of them were productive and significant contributors to the world without the need to be physically capable of lifting 100 pounds of brick.

Other policies that uphold this pillar will require our representatives to free our nation from debt. It will force them to make hard political choices and keep our nation running within it's means. It will require them to sacrifice the favors that they have wrongly curried and act in the true best interest of the nation. It will require them to stop excusing a degree of corruption based on a presumption that the ends justify the means. It will require us to hold them accountable for the choices they make that harm the nation instead of helping it.

Now for the hard part. We can sit back here and go on and on about how our representatives are unwilling to lead in a way that is to our benefit. But if we are unwilling to fire them when they do not do what is necessary they will have no motivation to do any of these things. It is our greatest challenge to hold our representatives truly responsible for breaking our trust and all of this is nothing more than a theory if we do not test it and force it into practice.



Creative Commons License
"Overview: The 3 Pillars of Public Policy" by Nathan L. Lowe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.

Saturday, April 15, 2017

Natural Rights: Part II The Origin and Expression of the Right to Life

Life, we all have the right to it. The questions, I hope to answer, are "Where does the right come from?" and "How is it expressed?".

Life is innately understood but like anything else, if you put enough thought into it, it can become quite confusing.

There have been several attempts to create a clinical description of what life is.
To quote Merriam-Webster:
 1-a "An organismic state characterized by capacity for metabolism, growth, reaction to stimuli, and reproduction."  
 2-a "The sequence of physical and mental experiences that make up the existence of an individual."
This is a sufficient description for the purposes of this writing.

Where does the right to life come from? 
There are two possible origins of this right and you may chose to accept whichever suits your individual beliefs. On one hand it is granted by a Creator. On the other hand it is a right that has been established and reinforced over millennia of evolutionary process. Whichever you choose to accept, it belongs to all living things and is a natural and established Natural Right.

How is The Right to Life expressed?
The Right to Life is not granted to an individual by another individual or group. It is a part of each of us. That does not mean that an individual may not be killed, but it does mean that the right to defend one's life, by whatever means possible, cannot be taken away.

Let's go back to the Merriam-Webster definition of life. 1-a "An organismic state characterised by . . .  reproduction" If reproduction, or propagation, is an aspect of life, then the resulting offspring is an extension of an individual's life and it is also a life of it's own. All animals protect their offspring until their offspring are able to protect themselves. This is also a Natural Law that has been established by either a Creator or the millions of years of evolutionary process that have helped a species to survive and advance as a whole. So, we are obliged to protect our offspring until they are capable of protecting themselves.

The beginnings of life are apparent at the moment an egg has been fertilized. This is the case in all animal reproduction. Whether the egg is external or internal, once it has been fertilized and the fertilized egg begins the process of cellular division, life is at work. Let's look back to Merriam-Webster again. 2-a "the sequence of [. . .] experiences that make up the existence of an individual". At the moment of conception a history of that life begins. It becomes and extension of the lives of the father and the mother. Both have equal claim to that offspring and both are obliged to protect that life until it can protect itself.

I understand that this will trigger a reaction on the issue of legalized abortion. That being said, this is not the reason I am writing this. I am not looking to trigger a debate over abortion I am simply attempting to discuss the Right to Life that we all possess and how it must pertain to our society as a whole. It does apply to society in many aspects outside of the abortion issue and I will be going into those aspects in more depth later in this series.

Thank you for reading so far and please feel free to comment and/or follow.


Creative Commons License
"Natural Rights: Part II The Origin and Expression of the Right to Life" by Nathan L. Lowe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.

Natural Rights: Part I, Life and Liberty

It is impossible for me to see one without the other. Every living thing exhibits these fundamental rights. From human to animal. Our society seems to have lost this instinctive and fundamental understanding. Perhaps, "lost" is not the correct word. Our society has decided to ignore these basic laws of nature.
Let me attempt to communicate my understanding of these 2 rights.

First of all Life. At the individual level, the right to life is simply the right to exist and the right to protect ones existence. It also includes the ability to propagate or have offspring which become extensions of one's own life and are therefore granted the same right of life as the parent. As a result the parent is obligated to protect the life of their offspring until the offspring is able to protect it's own life.

Secondly let's look at Liberty. Liberty, at it's root is the right of choice and the fact that no individual or group has the right to choose for another individual or group. All living things exhibit choice at some level. A fish chooses to swim up or down, right or left, eat, poop, propagate etc. There may not be a lot of contemplation prior to each choice but these are choices just the same. When we get to looking at humans, we do not only have the ability to choose but we have the ability to reason. This is where we get mucked up. We rationalize and hypothesize so that we can choose to believe these natural and fundamental laws do not apply to us. We can create "reasons" for violating these basic rights of others.

Our society as a whole has been working to take liberty away from one group to give to another for quite some time. Who or what defines one group or another and what is being taken or given is not the point. The point is that no individual or group has the right to take the life or liberty of another individual or group no matter how "legal" it may be. It still violates the natural law of things.

The understanding of these two natural rights is what lifted America to where it is in the world and the loss of this basic understanding of life and liberty is what will lead us to fall.

We have all been given Life and Liberty. Let's do more to protect it for others. Because, in the end, the more we protect others from the theft of these rights, the more we protect ourselves.

Creative Commons License
"Natural Rights: Part I, Life and Liberty" by Nathan L. Lowe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.

Friday, November 4, 2016

Shenanigans

History of events on 11/4/2016
Today at 5:55pm I was expecting to pick my daughter up from TEF. TEF has been ordered by the court to facilitate the exchanges of our children and all communication between my Ex and myself. That is until I received an email from my Ex indicating that he would not be bringing her to the exchange unless I paid his outstanding balance with TEF(a nonprofit that facilitates communication and child exchanges for exes that can't get along).
Now to provide a bit of history. He and I have mutual protective orders that require us to communicate only through TEF and that also requires that all exchanges of our daughter must be performed via TEF. Additionally we are required by the same court orders to split the cost of TEF equally.

My ex feels that this does not pertain to him. To date he has paid TEF once, but never again since he first setup the account. As a result they have had to cease facilitating exchanges once in the past, and almost again tonight. The last time his amount reached a level at which TEF would not facilitate the exchanges he had my daughter, and the only way for me to get her back for my scheduled time was to pay his bill. TEF documented this transaction and made it clear that any money received by them from him would be applied toward the money that he owed me first. Well, he never paid anything and today was the last exchange that the money I paid on his behalf would cover. Again, he had my daughter and he sent an email to me, via TEF, indicating that he would not be bringing my daughter to the scheduled exchange unless I paid his bill so that TEF would be willing to facilitate the upcoming exchange of my daughter next week. Of course I want my daughter for the time that I am allotted and he was not going to bring her under any circumstances that would allow his lack of payment to prevent his ability to receive her at the exchange next week.

After much thought I decided to pay his bill again. What else could I do? I have contacted the police on many occasions to facilitate an exchange, even before we had our protective orders and were required to exchange at TEF, with no action being taken. The common line was, "We are not in the business of taking children from one parent to give them to another." or some such B.S.

Now I understand the concern over wrongfully taking a child from a home and I understand the desire to protect a child from as much parental conflict as possible. But this situation evolved beyond the ridiculous months ago.

My Ex has never been held accountable for any of the shenanigans that he has pulled. He has filed multiple bogus protective orders against me just in an effort to keep my daughter from me. He has repeatedly created excuses not to return my daughter for her scheduled visits and earlier this summer he actually held my 17 year old hostage at his home because she wanted to join me and my fiance and his children on a family trip.

But I digress, back to today’s events. So I pay enough of his bill to satisfy his..... Whatever it is, and he finally agrees to bring my daughter to TEF for the exchange nearly 2 hours late. I return after he is gone and pick her up. then I get to thinking, there must be a law about this sort of thing. I dig into the internet for a few minutes and come across "Economic Exploitation of a Child" the definition that I find is this. "Economic exploitation of a child, also referred to as "criminal exploitation of a child," refers to the use of a child in any way for economic gain." Well, he has effectively held my daughter for ransom twice. I think that qualifies. So I think, "Hey maybe this will give me some leverage to address the abuse that my daughter has been forced to endure, because these agencies and charitable organizations that claim to be there to protect children will do nothing. On this list of "child safety organizations" that I have contacted is the State appointed Guardian Ad Litem, the Courts themselves, Child Protective Services, The Children's Justice Center, and the first line of defense the police. Three different police departments to be exact. So I call the police and explain that my Ex ransomed my daughter. Not once but twice. Guess what I was told............

.........."Well if you had not agreed to pay him and called us first, we could have charged him." WHAAAT!? So what he did is prosecutable before I give him money but not after? How does that make any sense at all! Oh, and let's not forget that every interaction I have had with the police about this matter, to date, has ended with, "We are not in the business of removing children from the home you will need to address this through the courts......"

I am outraged. My daughter is subjected to neglect (I asked her when she had a bath last and she says she can't remember because she is forced to suppress any self interest while she is at her dad's.), isolation(he confiscates her phone and refuses to allow her to have it to call me or for me to call her, while she is at dad's house), she is not taken to school 2 or 3 days a week while she is at her dad's, and the list goes on. I feel a deep sense of powerlessness when I think about what else she may endure, while there, that I know nothing about.

Some of you may say, "Well if it is so bad, why do you let her go there?" (I actually got this one from a cop tonight.) The answer is simple. Because no agency, organization, or individual is willing to intervene when the abuse is psychological, instead of physical. My only recourse is to play nice with the courts and obey the court orders to the letter, in the hopes that some how the truth of this will come out and I will finally be allowed to protect my daughter without risking her being placed in the hands of her abuser indefinitely because I did not follow the court order.


Any of you have any other bright ideas?


Creative Commons License

Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.

Friday, March 13, 2015

Fates of Three

Husband Father Love and duty
Adoration, his wifes beauty

Seeking shelter, for the night.
Hope will shine with dawns new light.

Wife Mother, child within
Hides the secret of her kin

Knows her husbands fate is sealed.
Tonight the rivals face revealed

Hence the rival comes to light.
His face first seen in Husbands sight.

Rivals might is then revealed.
Husband's doom, his life will yield.

In darkness grasp his breath withheld.
His final breath is love expelled.


The rival turns now to the mother.
He did travel for no other.

His power flies his blow deflected.
Her power shows the child protected.

Repeated blow, she starts to falter.
Another light the course will alter.

With streak of light hope advances
A man appears and light enhances

Darkness strikes and light is piercing
The two impaled Mother wincing.

As darkness falls and light is waning.
To mother he looks eyes are paining.

Mother asks "who sent you light?"
Light responds "twas she inside."



Creative Commons License
Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.

Monday, August 6, 2012

THE BLOOD OF OUR CHILDREN By: Nathan Lowe


THE BLOOD OF OUR CHILDREN WILL BE ON OUR HANDS! 

We are on the verge of relinquishing the last vestiges of the freedom that was purchased at so dear a price more than 200 years ago. The cost of that freedom was the blood shed by those revolutionaries who stood up to the greatest nation in the world and said, "No more!". The price to regain that freedom will be no less, if we lose it, and our children will be the ones who pay the price if we are unwilling to take up mastery of our fate as a nation.

We have, through our choices in elections past and present, yielded our rights to individual freedom, liberty, and individual determination, one by one. There have been excuses or "reasons" that we have used to justify our choices but they are nothing more than apathy. We have chosen to place our sovereignty in the hands of other men. These men have then used it to rule over us. We have deceived ourselves into believing that men who crave power would be willing to protect our rights over their ability to wield power over us. 

We must reclaim our power. Those we have given it to will not return it willingly. We must vote for what is right, not easy. We must choose what is right, not easy. We must not allow our children to pay the price, we have set, to be free as we once were. We must accept responsibility for our own fate. We must stand for our rights. We must not trust that those in power will work in our best interest. For our best interest is to reclaim our power and they will not yield it by choice. Without the power we have yielded to them they have none and they once again become "men" instead of "rulers of men".

We are meant to be the masters of our own fate. so I am putting forward the cry.

STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

We have been led to the gate. We must not walk beyond it for it will close and the gilding of the cage will be as dust once the door is locked behind us.

STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

We must flee from our would be jailers. We must loose the shackles they have so artfully crafted.

STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

We must not pass willingly into captivity. We are but a step away, and once the step is taken the only escape will be through pain, hardship, agony. We will be forced, like the wolf in the trap, to gnaw off our own leg for escape.

STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
STAND UP, STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

I will stand. I have taken my first step of defiance with this post. Save our children from the fate we have created for them. Do not let them pay the price for our sins. They are innocent in this and should not be expected to bleed in Gethsemane for our sins. We must claim this price for our own and insure the freedom of our children.

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please repost as much as you are able.
Nathan Lowe


Creative Commons License
Based on a work at nathan-lowe.blogspot.com.